← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Nye Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-19 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 55 15 21 36 0.654 0.1604 0.1605 0.4480 0.4482
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 27 2 2 4 0.148
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 27 2 2 4 0.148
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 27 2 2 4 0.148
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 27 2 2 4 0.148
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 27 2 2 4 0.148
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 27 2 2 4 0.148

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28632
Forward overall
#1674
Forward born in 2005
#1465
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Mary's · 2004-05
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.