IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-08-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 North York Rangers OJHL 51 11 14 25 0.490 0.1473 0.1588 0.3355 0.3618
2024-25 — OJHL 44 13 10 23 0.523 0.1570 0.1612 0.3578 0.3675
2025-26 — OJHL 47 19 25 44 0.936 0.2812 0.2735 0.6408 0.6233
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 Bowdoin D3 — SR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 Bowdoin D3 — JR 15 2 2 4 0.267
2004-05 Bowdoin D3 — SO 4 0 3 3 0.750
2003-04 Bowdoin D3 — FR 9 2 0 2 0.222

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26509
Forward overall
#1306
Forward born in 2006
#1595
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joey Martini
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2017-18
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Deiter Stange
Worcester State · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.