IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Mahy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Leamington Flyers OJHL 53 0 11 11 0.207 0.0509 0.0483 0.1429 0.1357
2024-25 Leamington Flyers OJHL 42 1 4 5 0.119 0.0292 0.0262 0.0819 0.0736
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 9 11 0.440
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 9 11 0.440
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 9 11 0.440
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 9 11 0.440
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 9 11 0.440
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 — — 25 2 9 11 0.440

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26781
Defenseman overall
#4187
Defenseman born in 2004
#4877
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Craig Stern
Framingham State · 2001-02
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick White
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Deschênes
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.