← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Careri Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-18 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Milton Academy NE-Prep 27 4 0 4 0.148 0.0293 0.0293 0.0675 0.0675
2023-24 Milton Academy NE-Prep 28 1 4 5 0.179 0.0354 0.0354 0.0814 0.0814
2024-25 Toronto Patriots OJHL 50 7 12 19 0.380 0.0931 0.0937 0.2616 0.2634
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New York University ACHA_D1 12 1 4 5 0.417
2024-25 New York University ACHA_D1 12 1 4 5 0.417
2023-24 New York University ACHA_D1 12 1 4 5 0.417
2022-23 New York University ACHA_D1 12 1 4 5 0.417
2021-22 New York University ACHA_D1 12 1 4 5 0.417

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
55%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#51689
Forward overall
#3400
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2003-04
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.