← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin O'Connor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 23 0 1 1 0.043 0.0107 0.0106 0.0299 0.0297
2003-04 Omaha Lancers USHL 52 4 11 15 0.288 0.1702 0.1649 0.8665 0.8394
2004-05 Omaha Lancers USHL 51 5 20 25 0.490 0.2892 0.2656 1.4723 1.3522
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SR 24 0 2 2 0.083
2013-14 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 19 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 19 1 1 2 0.105
2008-09 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2007-08 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 29 2 4 6 0.207
2006-07 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2006-07 · Western Michigan
+4.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7087
Defenseman overall
#834
Defenseman born in 1984

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2007-08
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2014-15
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.