IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Macdonald Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-01-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — CCHL 53 7 26 33 0.623 0.1350 0.1249 0.4817 0.4458
2001-02 — CCHL 42 1 4 5 0.119 0.0258 0.0227 0.0921 0.0810
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SR 26 14 19 33 1.269
2005-06 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 28 14 19 33 1.179
2004-05 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 29 20 14 34 1.172
2003-04 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 26 13 7 20 0.769
2001-02 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC FR 22 6 4 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2001-02 · Lebanon Valley
+325.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#45968
Forward overall
#910
Forward born in 1981
#1336
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marcus Mitchell
Johnson & Wales · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Goodman
King's · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Ebbole
UMass Boston · 2005-06
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.