| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 28 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 0.857 | 0.1859 | 0.1651 | 0.6630 | 0.5887 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | St. Michael's College | D2 | — | SR | 27 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 1.111 |
| 2002-03 | St. Michael's College | D2 | — | JR | 25 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 0.640 |
| 2001-02 | St. Michael's College | D2 | — | SO | 17 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.588 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.