IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Bancroft Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-01-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Cornwall Colts CCHL 30 0 2 2 0.067 0.0190 0.0206 0.0516 0.0559
2003-04 Rockland Nationals CCHL 49 6 14 20 0.408 0.1165 0.1205 0.3160 0.3267
2004-05 Brockville Braves CCHL 55 1 6 7 0.127 0.0363 0.0359 0.0985 0.0975
2005-06 Brockville Braves CCHL 58 3 12 15 0.259 0.0738 0.0698 0.2002 0.1894
2006-07 — CCHL 55 3 23 26 0.473 0.1349 0.1209 0.3659 0.3280
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2007-08 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+50.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13267
Defenseman overall
#1419
Defenseman born in 1986
#1558
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Turner Richards
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Tinoco
Southern Maine · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Nichols
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.