IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jamie Cavanaugh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Nepean Raiders CCHL 52 9 6 15 0.288 0.0626 0.0627 0.2233 0.2235
2005-06 Nepean Raiders CCHL 51 16 19 35 0.686 0.1489 0.1424 0.5313 0.5083
2006-07 — CCHL 57 24 23 47 0.825 0.1789 0.1623 0.6383 0.5791
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Salem State D3 — FR 9 0 2 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2007-08 · Salem State
+68.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26560
Forward overall
#875
Forward born in 1986
#562
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vick Schlueter
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vladislav Sorokin
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Vassallo
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.