IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Tremblay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-09-05 Country: Canada
2008 · Round 6, Pick #173  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 57 51 59 110 1.930 0.4186 0.4108 1.4931 1.4652
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 37 17 19 36 0.973
2010-11 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 33 9 12 21 0.636
2009-10 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 37 3 17 20 0.540
2008-09 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 36 4 7 11 0.306
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2008-09 · Clarkson
-13.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3832
Forward overall
#173
Forward born in 1988
#4
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Logan Nelson
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Forgione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Rothstein
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Cassells
Elmira · 2000-01
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michel Bond
SUNY Geneseo · 2000-01
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Tyrie
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.