IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Jacobs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-03-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Cornwall Colts CCHL 57 2 6 8 0.140 0.0305 0.0322 0.1086 0.1146
2008-09 Cornwall Colts CCHL 60 4 12 16 0.267 0.0578 0.0576 0.2063 0.2057
2009-10 Cornwall Colts CCHL 60 3 9 12 0.200 0.0434 0.0413 0.1547 0.1471
2010-11 Cornwall Colts CCHL 58 3 10 13 0.224 0.0486 0.0438 0.1733 0.1562
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Lawrence D3 ECAC SO 19 4 5 9 0.474
2007-08 Lawrence D3 ECAC FR 26 9 13 22 0.846

NCAAe Rankings

#21830
Defenseman overall
#1915
Defenseman born in 1990
#1703
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Norby
SUNY Brockport · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Thiering
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Rizzardo
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.