← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Bird Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Brockville Braves CCHL 56 9 13 22 0.393 0.0852 0.0878 0.3040 0.3133
2009-10 CCHL 41 2 7 9 0.220 0.0476 0.0469 0.1698 0.1672
2010-11 Brockville Braves CCHL 47 5 5 10 0.213 0.0462 0.0432 0.1646 0.1539
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2020-21 · Ohio University
+190.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#50879
Forward overall
#1841
Forward born in 1990
#1595
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2007-08
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.