IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Barr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-04-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Cornwall Colts CCHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 34 2 5 7 0.206 0.0447 0.0473 0.1593 0.1687
2010-11 — CCHL 55 2 10 12 0.218 0.0473 0.0477 0.1688 0.1704
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Curry D3 CNE SO 17 1 4 5 0.294
2010-11 Curry D3 CNE FR 20 1 0 1 0.050
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2010-11 · Curry
+11.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22590
Defenseman overall
#2096
Defenseman born in 1992
#1737
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh McArdle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colton Brausen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jameson O'Flynn
Bethel · 2022-23
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Deveny
Canton · 2012-13
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.