IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Deveny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 53 11 9 20 0.377 0.1054 0.1067 0.2604 0.2635
2013-14 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 46 12 13 25 0.543 0.1519 0.1460 0.3751 0.3605
2014-15 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 45 19 18 37 0.822 0.2297 0.2089 0.5674 0.5159
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Canton D3 — SR 22 10 11 21 0.955
2017-18 Canton D3 — JR 25 16 5 21 0.840
2016-17 Canton D3 — SO 22 7 7 14 0.636
2015-16 Canton D3 — FR 20 2 7 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2015-16 · Canton
+186.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23397
Forward overall
#944
Forward born in 1994
#1893
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curtis Hammond
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Thompson
Connecticut College · 2015-16
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carter Cowlthorp
Norwich · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.