IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Deveny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 53 11 9 20 0.377 0.0925 0.0936 0.2598 0.2629
2013-14 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 46 12 13 25 0.543 0.1332 0.1280 0.3742 0.3596
2014-15 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 45 19 18 37 0.822 0.2015 0.1832 0.5661 0.5147
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Canton D1 SUNYAC SR 22 10 11 21 0.955
2018-19 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 22 10 11 21 0.955
2017-18 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 25 16 5 21 0.840
2016-17 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 22 7 7 14 0.636
2015-16 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 20 2 7 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2015-16 · Canton
+226.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30013
Forward overall
#1155
Forward born in 1994
#1569
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curtis Hammond
St. Norbert · 2021-22
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Vince
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Thompson
Connecticut College · 2015-16
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.