← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Baylis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0723 0.0811 0.2579 0.2895
2011-12 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 51 8 8 16 0.314 0.0680 0.0728 0.2427 0.2600
2012-13 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 54 15 22 37 0.685 0.1486 0.1526 0.5301 0.5444
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 52 24 38 62 1.192 0.2586 0.2527 0.9225 0.9014
2014-15 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 54 32 37 69 1.278 0.2772 0.2581 0.9886 0.9203
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 37 8 14 22 0.595
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 40 9 22 31 0.775
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 40 3 11 14 0.350
2015-16 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 35 9 13 22 0.629
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2015-16 · Bowling Green
+186.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11727
Forward overall
#504
Forward born in 1994
#117
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2023-24
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.