IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rob Michel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 60 8 24 32 0.533 0.1157 0.1150 0.4126 0.4100
2014-15 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 57 16 37 53 0.930 0.2017 0.1911 0.7194 0.6817
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 36 3 6 9 0.250
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 33 5 12 17 0.515
2016-17 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 34 9 10 19 0.559
2015-16 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 34 0 8 8 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · Maine
+55.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4752
Defenseman overall
#857
Defenseman born in 1994
#419
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Warfield
Utica · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan McDonald
Framingham State · 2007-08
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Kender
Rivier · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.