IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Dauda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-21 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 50 29 38 67 1.340 0.2906 0.2822 1.0368 1.0068
2015-16 Navan Grads CCHL 25 11 26 37 1.480 0.3210 0.2962 1.1451 1.0566
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Colgate D1 ECAC SR 34 5 6 11 0.324
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 38 10 9 19 0.500
2016-17 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 24 5 7 12 0.500
2015-16 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 20 2 7 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2015-16 · Colgate
+86.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7127
Forward overall
#346
Forward born in 1995
#30
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitchell McPherson
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian DeLong
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Joy
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.