← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Lalonde Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 CCHL 51 10 13 23 0.451 0.0978 0.1082 0.3489 0.3858
2015-16 Cornwall Colts CCHL 58 23 26 49 0.845 0.1832 0.1938 0.6536 0.6912
2016-17 Cornwall Colts CCHL 55 32 41 73 1.327 0.2879 0.2894 1.0269 1.0321
2017-18 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 47 30 30 60 1.277 0.2769 0.2640 0.9877 0.9417
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 24 6 7 13 0.542
2019-20 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 32 2 7 9 0.281
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 40 7 9 16 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2018-19 · Robert Morris
+70.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10232
Forward overall
#453
Forward born in 1998
#82
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.