IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Taillefer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Rockland Nationals CCHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Rockland Nationals CCHL 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 48 8 12 20 0.417 0.1060 0.1077 0.1729 0.1757
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 6 1 2 3 0.500
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 6 1 2 3 0.500
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 6 1 2 3 0.500
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 6 1 2 3 0.500
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 6 1 2 3 0.500
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 6 1 2 3 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2020-21 · Niagara
+419.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#54752
Forward overall
#3353
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Cartier
Salem State · 2001-02
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Stoynich
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Dalton
St. Scholastica · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.