IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Whyte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kemptville 73's CCHL 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1596 0.1596 0.3871 0.3871
2020-21 Kemptville 73's CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Kemptville 73's CCHL 47 13 10 23 0.489 0.1563 0.1587 0.3788 0.3846
2022-23 Kemptville 73's CCHL 52 25 16 41 0.788 0.2518 0.2444 0.6104 0.5924
2023-24 Kemptville 73's CCHL 19 18 15 33 1.737 0.5546 0.5088 1.3445 1.2334
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA SO 26 3 1 4 0.154
2024-25 RIT D1 AHA — 27 2 2 4 0.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2024-25 · RIT
-57.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10556
Forward overall
#468
Forward born in 2003
#122
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Seltenreich
New England · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Peters
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Berry
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.