IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Schaumburger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 36 13 16 29 0.806 0.1054 0.1054 — —
2021-22 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 41 37 38 75 1.829 0.2393 0.2392 0.6209 0.6207
2022-23 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 40 22 47 69 1.725 0.2256 0.2144 0.5855 0.5565
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA — 24 3 3 6 0.250
2024-25 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA — 24 3 3 6 0.250
2023-24 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA — 24 3 3 6 0.250
2022-23 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA — 24 3 3 6 0.250
2021-22 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA — 24 3 3 6 0.250
2020-21 Adrian ACHA_D1 NCHA — 24 3 3 6 0.250

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5534
Forward overall
#237
Forward born in 2002
#124
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tanner Fahlstedt
Salem State · 2011-12
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kent Bostrom
Bethel · 2004-05
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Lundgren
Curry · 2023-24
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.