IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Wallace Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-03-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Windsor Spitfires OHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Windsor Spitfires OHL 56 1 2 3 0.054 0.0311 0.0308 0.1373 0.1360
2009-10 Windsor Spitfires OHL 57 6 3 9 0.158 0.0916 0.0864 0.4046 0.3814
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2003-04 New England College D3 — JR 26 8 17 25 0.962
2002-03 New England College D3 — SO 23 14 19 33 1.435
2001-02 New England College D3 — FR 20 14 15 29 1.450

NCAAe Rankings

#22786
Defenseman overall
#1954
Defenseman born in 1990
#2566
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Zech
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ricky Helmbrecht
Curry · 2004-05
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Darcy
New England · 2016-17
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.