IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Mullen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-07-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Omaha Lancers USHL 26 2 1 3 0.115 0.0681 0.0628 0.3466 0.3196
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 27 13 19 32 1.185
2006-07 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 28 11 16 27 0.964
2005-06 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 20 8 11 19 0.950
2002-03 UMass D1 HockeyEast FR 22 0 1 1 0.045

NCAAe Rankings

#53219
Forward overall
#1384
Forward born in 1983
#4058
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Whelan
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stephen Beck
Western New England · 2014-15
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Snider
Manhattanville · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.