IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Lugris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Nichols NE-Prep 6 2 2 4 0.667 0.1321 0.1321 0.3037 0.3037
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 44 16 23 39 0.886 0.3614 0.3614 0.7125 0.7125
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 25 13 23 36 1.440 0.5871 0.5557 1.1575 1.0957
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 34 4 8 12 0.353
2023-24 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 36 8 6 14 0.389
2022-23 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 8 0 2 2 0.250
2021-22 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 17 4 1 5 0.294
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2021-22 · Penn State
+160.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2723
Forward overall
#107
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Gaffney
Utica · 2008-09
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Laganiere
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikita Kozyrev
Buffalo State · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.