IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-04-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 London Knights OHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 London Knights OHL 39 0 6 6 0.154 0.0893 0.0889 0.3941 0.3922
2011-12 London Knights OHL 56 2 8 10 0.179 0.1036 0.0978 0.4577 0.4321
2012-13 London Knights OHL 67 1 15 16 0.239 0.1386 0.1239 0.6119 0.5470
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2003-04 Assumption D2 — FR 6 1 1 2 0.333

NCAAe Rankings

#14620
Defenseman overall
#1618
Defenseman born in 1992
#2164
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kris Boyce
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Kussmann
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.