← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kasper Magnussen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-19 Country: Norway
Signed Professionally
Leksands IF · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Leksands IF U20 SuperElit 37 8 17 25 0.676 0.2647 0.2735 0.8300 0.8576
2022-23 Leksands IF U20 SuperElit 45 17 13 30 0.667 0.2612 0.2598 0.8189 0.8145
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CCHA JR 36 10 21 31 0.861
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CCHA SO 37 7 9 16 0.432
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CCHA FR 29 7 4 11 0.379
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2023-24 · Bemidji State
+67.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12719
Forward overall
#576
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Williams · 2018-19
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2020-21
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2010-11
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.