IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anton Svensson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-02-25 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Rögle BK U20 SuperElit 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2008-09 Rögle BK U20 SuperElit 33 6 3 9 0.273 0.1076 0.1062 0.3350 0.3308
2009-10 Rögle BK U20 SHL-J20 16 4 2 6 0.375 0.2071 0.1946 0.5005 0.4702
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 29 16 17 33 1.138
2015-16 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 26 13 13 26 1.000
2014-15 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 21 8 11 19 0.905
2013-14 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 16 2 2 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2013-14 · Wisconsin-Superior
+83.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33754
Forward overall
#1226
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Ursitti
Hamilton · 2015-16
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Crowe
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Zepeda
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.