IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Hrip Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Louisiana Drillers NA3HL 36 20 17 37 1.028 0.1290 0.1290 0.3245 0.3245
2021-22 Louisiana Drillers NA3HL 34 34 21 55 1.618 0.2030 0.1999 0.5107 0.5028
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 31 13 18 31 1.000
2024-25 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 31 13 18 31 1.000
2023-24 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 31 13 18 31 1.000
2022-23 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 31 13 18 31 1.000
2021-22 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 31 13 18 31 1.000
2020-21 University of Pittsburgh ACHA_D1 — — 31 13 18 31 1.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14679
Forward overall
#742
Forward born in 2002
#202
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Isherwood
Curry · 2023-24
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cole
Trinity · 2011-12
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Rhymer
SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.