← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jameson Bain Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-01-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NA3HL 33 0 3 3 0.091 0.0209 0.0209 0.0288 0.0288
2021-22 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 46 4 4 8 0.174 0.0400 0.0405 0.0551 0.0558
2022-23 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 36 2 5 7 0.194 0.0447 0.0432 0.0616 0.0595
2023-24 Norwich Sea Captains NA3HL 44 4 4 8 0.182 0.0418 0.0384 0.0576 0.0529
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 7 11 18 0.600
2024-25 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 7 11 18 0.600
2023-24 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 7 11 18 0.600
2022-23 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 7 11 18 0.600
2021-22 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 7 11 18 0.600
2020-21 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 30 7 11 18 0.600

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27450
Defenseman overall
#4156
Defenseman born in 2003
#4776
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.115 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2005-06
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2016-17
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.