IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erik Gibboney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 30 7 9 16 0.533 0.0698 0.0698 0.1810 0.1810
2021-22 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 47 21 43 64 1.362 0.1709 0.1608 0.4299 0.4044
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 9 13 0.542
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 9 13 0.542
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 9 13 0.542
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 9 13 0.542
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 9 13 0.542
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 24 4 9 13 0.542

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23668
Forward overall
#1186
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bobby Cahill
Hobart · 2005-06
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kent Detlefsen
Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Artur Terchiyev
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.