← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Scribner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 43 3 17 20 0.465 0.0584 0.0628 0.1468 0.1579
2022-23 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 33 1 16 17 0.515 0.0647 0.0667 0.1626 0.1675
2023-24 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 46 6 23 29 0.630 0.0791 0.0777 0.1990 0.1954
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Mary ACHA_D1 35 6 17 23 0.657
2024-25 University of Mary ACHA_D1 35 6 17 23 0.657
2023-24 University of Mary ACHA_D1 35 6 17 23 0.657
2022-23 University of Mary ACHA_D1 35 6 17 23 0.657
2021-22 University of Mary ACHA_D1 35 6 17 23 0.657
2020-21 University of Mary ACHA_D1 35 6 17 23 0.657

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13229
Defenseman overall
#2671
Defenseman born in 2004
#2152
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2023-24
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2022-23
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.