← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Motz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Texas Roadrunners NA3HL 47 0 18 18 0.383 0.0481 0.0492 0.1209 0.1238
2022-23 Texas Roadrunners NA3HL 45 3 16 19 0.422 0.0530 0.0518 0.1333 0.1304
2023-24 Texas Roadrunners NA3HL 45 4 27 31 0.689 0.0865 0.0805 0.2175 0.2023
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 16 1 4 5 0.312
2024-25 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 16 1 4 5 0.312
2023-24 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 16 1 4 5 0.312
2022-23 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 16 1 4 5 0.312
2021-22 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 16 1 4 5 0.312
2020-21 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 16 1 4 5 0.312

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13834
Defenseman overall
#2683
Defenseman born in 2003
#2265
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2017-18
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2012-13
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.