IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Cunningham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 29 2 6 8 0.276 0.0346 0.0362 0.0871 0.0911
2022-23 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 47 3 27 30 0.638 0.0801 0.0801 0.2015 0.2016
2023-24 Helena Bighorns NA3HL 39 12 48 60 1.538 0.1931 0.1839 0.4857 0.4626
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222
2024-25 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222
2023-24 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222
2022-23 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222
2021-22 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222
2020-21 University of Mary ACHA_D1 — — 9 0 2 2 0.222

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5717
Defenseman overall
#1398
Defenseman born in 2003
#710
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Worre
Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Orn
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Lawson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.