← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Brackett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NA3HL 43 0 4 4 0.093 0.0117 0.0127 0.0294 0.0320
2022-23 Minnesota Wilderness NA3HL 47 5 13 18 0.383 0.0481 0.0501 0.1209 0.1260
2023-24 Chicago Cougars USPHL-Premier 42 8 11 19 0.452 0.0592 0.0589 0.1535 0.1528
2024-25 Toledo Cherokee USPHL-Premier 35 2 13 15 0.429 0.0561 0.0525 0.1455 0.1363
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 31 6 13 19 0.613
2024-25 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 31 6 13 19 0.613
2023-24 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 31 6 13 19 0.613
2022-23 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 31 6 13 19 0.613
2021-22 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 31 6 13 19 0.613
2020-21 West Virginia University ACHA_D1 31 6 13 19 0.613

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40328
Forward overall
#2596
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.