IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Warneke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-07-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 49 6 2 8 0.163 0.0542 0.0535 0.1513 0.1493
2007-08 Canmore Eagles AJHL 59 11 13 24 0.407 0.1350 0.1257 0.3770 0.3512
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 3 0 1 1 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2009-10 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+302.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46253
Forward overall
#1499
Forward born in 1987
#2219
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Aragon
New England · 2017-18
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devyn Orpana
Adrian · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Egan Schmitt
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.