IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Porter Wolk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0314 0.0323 0.0789 0.0811
2022-23 Texas Roadrunners NA3HL 44 6 12 18 0.409 0.0513 0.0504 0.1292 0.1270
2023-24 Texas Roadrunners NA3HL 47 14 28 42 0.894 0.1121 0.1048 0.2821 0.2637
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 4 1 1 2 0.500
2024-25 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 4 1 1 2 0.500
2023-24 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 4 1 1 2 0.500
2022-23 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 4 1 1 2 0.500
2021-22 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 4 1 1 2 0.500
2020-21 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 4 1 1 2 0.500

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35149
Forward overall
#2150
Forward born in 2003
#1523
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

C.J Buckingham
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lubos Taragel
Hamline · 2000-01
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Landon Brownlee
Middlebury · 2024-25
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.