← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Ceselka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Jersey Shore Whalers USPHL-Premier 35 14 25 39 1.114 0.1458 0.1511 0.3782 0.3919
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 38 14 16 30 0.789 0.1033 0.1020 0.2680 0.2645
2023-24 New Jersey Bears EHL 32 7 8 15 0.469 0.1083 0.1046 0.2294 0.2215
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 27 8 7 15 0.556
2024-25 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 27 8 7 15 0.556
2023-24 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 27 8 7 15 0.556
2022-23 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 27 8 7 15 0.556
2021-22 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 27 8 7 15 0.556
2020-21 SUNY Oswego ACHA_D1 SUNYAC 27 8 7 15 0.556

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22622
Forward overall
#1212
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Post · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.