IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Crowley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 10 12 22 0.468 0.0587 0.0620 0.1478 0.1561
2023-24 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 29 30 59 1.255 0.1575 0.1587 0.3963 0.3994
2024-25 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 37 47 84 1.787 0.2243 0.2144 0.5642 0.5393
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 15 4 3 7 0.467
2024-25 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 15 4 3 7 0.467
2023-24 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 15 4 3 7 0.467
2022-23 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 15 4 3 7 0.467
2021-22 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 15 4 3 7 0.467
2020-21 University of Utah ACHA_D1 — — 15 4 3 7 0.467

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15800
Forward overall
#762
Forward born in 2004
#240
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Gagnon
Franklin Pierce · 2015-16
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Erik Cooper
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon O'Quinn
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.