IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Xander St. Pierre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-29 Country: USA
Misericordia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 New Hampshire Jr. Mountain Kings NA3HL 38 10 16 26 0.684 0.0872 0.0915 0.2164 0.2271
2024-25 New Hampshire Jr. Mountain Kings NA3HL 44 16 16 32 0.727 0.0927 0.0924 0.2300 0.2294
2025-26 New Jersey Bears EHL 49 8 7 15 0.306 0.0707 0.0685 0.1497 0.1451
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39508
Forward overall
#2463
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Misericordia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Chase Cummings
0.00
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
Ryan Karbach
0.40
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
Colin Stow
0.00
actual FR PPG at Misericordia
Brendan Johnson
0.17
actual FR PPG at Misericordia

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Monk
Skidmore · 2018-19
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyler Harding
Plymouth State · 2018-19
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kahlil Fontana
Hobart · 2021-22
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.