← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyler Harding Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 East Coast Minutemen NA3HL 46 9 19 28 0.609 0.0764 0.0797
2017-18 Brooklyn Aviators USPHL-Premier 39 6 21 27 0.692 0.0906 0.0905 0.2350 0.2348
2018-19 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 42 6 21 27 0.643 0.1485 0.1435 0.3146 0.3040
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 16 2 1 3 0.188
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 14 1 1 2 0.143
2020-21 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast FR 22 2 3 5 0.227
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 22 2 3 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2019-20 · Plymouth State
+96.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6500
Defenseman overall
#1337
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Misericordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2021-22
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.