IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garren Narvaez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Seahawks Hockey EHL 28 2 7 9 0.321 0.0742 0.0795 0.1573 0.1684
2024-25 Great Falls Americans NA3HL 47 15 36 51 1.085 0.1362 0.1349 0.3426 0.3394
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 6 7 0.280
2024-25 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 6 7 0.280
2023-24 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 6 7 0.280
2022-23 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 6 7 0.280
2021-22 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 6 7 0.280
2020-21 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 1 6 7 0.280

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31867
Forward overall
#1901
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Martin
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Doden
Augsburg · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Blitz
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.