IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Scott Neitzel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-04-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Wisconsin Woodsmen NA3HL 18 0 2 2 0.111 0.0139 0.0143 0.0351 0.0362
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 2 2 0.125
2024-25 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 2 2 0.125
2023-24 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 2 2 0.125
2022-23 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 2 2 0.125
2021-22 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 2 2 0.125
2020-21 Grand Valley State University ACHA_D1 — — 16 0 2 2 0.125

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
68%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30422
Defenseman overall
#4495
Defenseman born in 2005
#5408
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason Krych
Augsburg · 2015-16
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carson Nickulas
Endicott · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Hitchcock
Marian · 2005-06
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.