IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Krych Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2014-15 Tri-City Storm USHL 35 1 3 4 0.114 0.0674 0.0707 0.3433 0.3601
2015-16 Tri-City Storm USHL 38 0 4 4 0.105 0.0621 0.0622 0.3163 0.3170
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Augsburg D1 MIAC SR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 20 1 4 5 0.250
2018-19 Augsburg D1 MIAC JR 28 2 10 12 0.429
2018-19 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 28 2 10 12 0.429
2017-18 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 22 3 6 9 0.409
2016-17 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 17 1 5 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2016-17 · Augsburg
+470.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22827
Defenseman overall
#2828
Defenseman born in 1997
#4087
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Mesi
Hamilton · 2003-04
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Seth Stadheim
Connecticut College · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Novotny
New England College · 2019-20
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.