IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Stadheim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kimball Union NE-Prep 36 10 9 19 0.528 0.1046 0.1046 0.2405 0.2405
2019-20 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 50 16 23 39 0.780 0.3180 0.3180 0.6270 0.6270
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 22 4 2 6 0.273
2022-23 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 18 4 9 13 0.722
2021-22 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 23 5 7 12 0.522
2020-21 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 5 3 0 3 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2020-21 · Connecticut College
+570.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
90%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12618
Forward overall
#538
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kasper Kjellkvist
Curry · 2015-16
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Mood
Chatham · 2017-18
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.