IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kasper Kjellkvist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-19 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Växjö Lakers HC U20 SuperElit 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0395 0.0421 0.1357 0.1445
2015-16 Växjö Lakers HC U20 SHL-J20 13 1 4 5 0.385 0.2124 0.2158 0.5123 0.5205
2016-17 Växjö Lakers HC U20 SHL-J20 28 4 4 8 0.286 0.1578 0.1520 0.3806 0.3665
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Utica D1 UCHC JR 29 15 16 31 1.069
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC — 29 15 16 31 1.069
2018-19 Curry D1 CNE SO 22 7 15 22 1.000
2018-19 Curry D3 CNE — 22 7 15 22 1.000
2017-18 Curry D3 CNE — 24 6 9 15 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2017-18 · Curry
+311.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36417
Forward overall
#1741
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Muise
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Drysdale
Canton · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Hodd-Chlebeck
Saint John's · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.