← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Novotny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 27 9 8 17 0.630 0.1776 0.1776 0.2881 0.2881
2019-20 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 26 5 6 11 0.423 0.1194 0.1194 0.1936 0.1936
2020-21 Seahawks Hockey EHL 13 3 5 8 0.615 0.2166 0.2166 0.3017 0.3017
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 27 11 8 19 0.704
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 26 5 3 8 0.308
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 24 10 8 18 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2021-22 · New England College
+514.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
75%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31921
Forward overall
#1695
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2009-10
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.