IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Robbins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 50 18 26 44 0.880 0.2470 0.2509 0.7234 0.7347
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 36 9 5 14 0.389
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 37 11 10 21 0.568
2016-17 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 34 6 13 19 0.559
2015-16 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 36 4 7 11 0.306
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2015-16 · Maine
+42.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22174
Forward overall
#828
Forward born in 1995
#45
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Holyoke
Assumption · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Ripple
SUNY Geneseo · 2010-11
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Lee
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.