← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colton Maynard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Dells Ducks USPHL-Premier 37 9 8 17 0.460 0.0601 0.0587 0.1560 0.1524
2018-19 Dells Ducks USPHL-Premier 36 5 4 9 0.250 0.0327 0.0302 0.0848 0.0783
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44551
Forward overall
#2373
Forward born in 1998
#4377
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Misericordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.