← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Nordmark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-05-04 Country: Sweden
2026 NHL Draft Eligible  (Intl)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 17 9 9 18 1.059 0.5907 0.6474 1.5258 1.6723
2025-26 Djurgårdens IF U20 SuperElit 25 14 24 38 1.520 0.5852 0.6192 1.9760 2.0908
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#590
Forward overall
#4
Forward born in 2008
#22
in SHL-J20

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.87 PPG
→ Harvard (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.57 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Denver (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.