← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Brauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-02-23 Country: Sweden
2026 NHL Draft Eligible  (Intl)
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Timrå IK U20 SuperElit 27 10 11 21 0.778 0.2995 0.3140 1.0111 1.0600
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6205
Forward overall
#91
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ RPI (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2000-01
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.